OTHER STATES: Rhode Island going the wrong way

Rhode Island is considering going to a full-time legislature. It last considered the issue in 1993, but rightly rejected it at that time for several reasons (quoted in the article) including:

* More people are available to serve part-time, which increases the likelihood "the General Assembly will reflect the diversity of views and interests in the state."

* Legislators who "have to earn a living outside the legislature" are more likely to be "in touch" with constituent concerns.

* Full-time legislators would have an "occupational incentive" to build up large campaign chests which, in turn, would feed the perception that special interests rule.

* "Little testimony or support for the idea that sessions should be longer."